Article: Análisis contrastivo de la encapsulación fórica en checo y español basado en corpus de sentencias jurídicas
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Alternative Title
Authors
Pešková, Jana
Editor
Abstract
El artículo propone examinar la tipología de los mecanismos de cohesión textual en español y checo, especialmente en textos jurídicos del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea. Se centra en el fenómeno de la encapsulación fórica, un mecanismo cohesivo que consiste en condensar los segmentos textuales anteriores (encapsulación anafórica) o posteriores (encapsulación catafórica). Se explora la tipología de la encapsulación fórica, distinguiendo entre elementos gramaticales y léxicos. Se detalla la función de proformas gramaticales como pronombres y adverbios, así como de sintagmas nominales y conectores. Ante la variedad terminológica relacionada con el concepto, se propone el término encapsulación fórica y se analizan estrategias de traducción del español al checo, utilizando un corpus de textos jurídicos. El tema se aborda desde una perspectiva contrastiva, evaluando si la distribución y tipología de los mecanismos de encapsulación se mantienen en la traducción. Se plantean preguntas sobre la percepción de traductores respecto a estos elementos y la posible modificación de su semántica en el proceso de traducción. Se clasifican patrones traslativos, enfocándose en cambios en la semántica como la explicitación, recategorización o implicitación. El análisis de sentencias del Tribunal de Justicia de la UE en español y su traducción al checo revela la presencia de encapsuladores en construcciones estereotipadas, comunes en el género jurídico. Se destaca la tendencia hacia cierta literalidad en la traducción, especialmente en la preservación de la semántica de los encapsuladores. Se observa una relación estrecha entre la encapsulación y el uso de marcadores discursivos, evidenciando patrones gramaticales en la traducción al checo.
Contrastive analysis of phoric encapsulation in Czech and Spanish based on corpus of legal sentences. The article aims to examine the typology of textual cohesion mechanisms in Spanish and Czech, especially in legal texts of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It focuses on the phenomenon of phoric encapsulation, a cohesive mechanism which consists of condensing and summarising preceding (anaphoric encapsulation) or following (cataphoric encapsulation) textual segments. The typology of phoric encapsulation is explored, distinguishing between grammatical and lexical elements. The function of grammatical proforms such as pronouns and adverbs, as well as nominal syntagms and connectors, is detailed. In view of the terminological variety related to the concept, the term phoric encapsulation is proposed and translation strategies from Spanish into Czech are analysed, using a corpus of legal texts. The topic is approached from a contrastive perspective, assessing whether the distribution and typology of encapsulation mechanisms are maintained in translation. Questions are raised about translators’ perception of these elements and the possible modification of their semantics in the translation process. Translational patterns are classified, focusing on changes in semantics such as explicitation, recategorisation or implicitation. The analysis of judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU in Spanish and their translation into Czech reveals the presence of encapsulators in stereotypical constructions, common in the legal genre. The tendency towards a certain literalness in translation, especially in the preservation of the semantics of encapsulators, is ighlighted. A close relationship is observed between encapsulation and the use of discourse markers, evidencing grammatical patterns in the Czech translation.
Contrastive analysis of phoric encapsulation in Czech and Spanish based on corpus of legal sentences. The article aims to examine the typology of textual cohesion mechanisms in Spanish and Czech, especially in legal texts of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It focuses on the phenomenon of phoric encapsulation, a cohesive mechanism which consists of condensing and summarising preceding (anaphoric encapsulation) or following (cataphoric encapsulation) textual segments. The typology of phoric encapsulation is explored, distinguishing between grammatical and lexical elements. The function of grammatical proforms such as pronouns and adverbs, as well as nominal syntagms and connectors, is detailed. In view of the terminological variety related to the concept, the term phoric encapsulation is proposed and translation strategies from Spanish into Czech are analysed, using a corpus of legal texts. The topic is approached from a contrastive perspective, assessing whether the distribution and typology of encapsulation mechanisms are maintained in translation. Questions are raised about translators’ perception of these elements and the possible modification of their semantics in the translation process. Translational patterns are classified, focusing on changes in semantics such as explicitation, recategorisation or implicitation. The analysis of judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU in Spanish and their translation into Czech reveals the presence of encapsulators in stereotypical constructions, common in the legal genre. The tendency towards a certain literalness in translation, especially in the preservation of the semantics of encapsulators, is ighlighted. A close relationship is observed between encapsulation and the use of discourse markers, evidencing grammatical patterns in the Czech translation.
Description
Subject Headings
španělština, čeština, právo, mluvnice, lingvistika
Keywords
Encapsulación fórica. Anáforas. Lingüística del texto. Enfoque contrastivo. Sentencias jurídicas, horic encapsulation. Anaphora. Text linguistics. Contrastive approach. Legal sentence, anaforická enkapsulace, anafora, textová lingvistika, kontrastivní přístup, právní věta
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
10.15452/SR.2024.24.0003
License
CC BY-NC 4.0
Citation
Studia Romanistica 24(1), 2024, 53-73